Category Archives: Ed Park

Our Next Reading is on Monday, April 23 at 7pm

Posted on by

We are holding our second FPP Harlem Reading at Shrine next Monday night 4/23 at 7pm featuring playwright Bathsheba Doran; former editor of The Believer and novelist Ed Park; and short story writer Tiphanie Yanique.

Writers will read from their body of work and new pieces exploring the plural voice. Join us for this one-of-a-kind evening!  It’s FREE and there’s a cash bar.  You will find us at: Shrine World Music Venue, located at 2271 Adam Clayton Powell Blvd. Harlem, NY http://www.shrinenyc.com/

Ed Park: The FPP Harlem Interview

Posted on by

FPP Harlem spoke with our “first person corporate” author Ed Park (Personal Days) about walls of prose that resemble Chinese calligraphy, the opportunities afforded by the first person plural voice, and faded gyro posters from 1997.

Can you tell us a little about your current writing project?

What began as a modest collection of my short pieces (both fiction and nonfiction) has turned into something else. The working title is Two Laptops, which is also the title for several of the new pieces in the book. The new pieces (or ideas for new ones) are now bumping out many of the old ones (i.e., the initial premise/scaffolding). The working title is imposing some sort of new, more interesting order on the material. To read more of this interview, go here.

In The New Inquiry: Ed Park’s Personal Days, First Person Corporate?

Posted on by

Anton Steinpilz offers a thoughtful and in-depth analysis of characteristics the neoliberal novel in The New Inquiry.  He considers Ed Park’s Personal Days as part of that emerging project.  “Here Park manages to articulate a narrative point of view you might call first-person corporate — which, incidentally, he marshals throughout the whole of Personal Days to great effect, giving new impetus and texture to Dilbertian anomie. The resonances with Tretyakov’s biography of the object are obvious; but whereas Tretyakov points toward overcoming workers’ alienation, Park simply characterizes such alienation in terms consistent with 21st-century work life. Tretyakov imagines a novel without a hero. Park imagines one without a reader.”  For the entire essay, click here.